Abstract editorial illustration for this guide

This guide is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Rules change and vary by state — verify current requirements with official sources or a licensed attorney.

In a criminal case the two parties are the government and the accused. A person harmed by the crime is, formally, neither — which is why so many victims describe feeling like a spectator at their own case. That structure has not changed, but the law built around it has. Federal statute and every state now give victims a defined set of enforceable rights: to be told what is happening, to be present, to speak at the moments that matter, to confer with the prosecutor, and to be repaid.

Those rights are real, but they are not self-executing. Most of them depend on a victim being registered for notification, on speaking up when a right is overlooked, and on knowing which office to call. This guide sets out what the rights are, how they work in federal and state cases, and what to do when one is denied.

Key takeaways

  • The federal Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, enumerates ten rights, including notice, attendance, being heard, conferring with the prosecutor, and full and timely restitution.
  • Every state has its own scheme, many written into the state constitution; coverage and enforcement mechanisms differ.
  • Victims are not parties and cannot direct charging or dismissal decisions, but they can assert rights directly in court.
  • The right to be heard applies at release, plea, sentencing, and parole proceedings — not only at sentencing.
  • Restitution compensates documented losses caused by the offense; it is separate from compensation funds and from civil lawsuits.

The ten rights under the federal statute

Enacted in 2004, the Crime Victims' Rights Act applies in federal criminal cases. Its text at 18 U.S.C. § 3771 lists the following rights:

  1. The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
  2. The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of public court proceedings, of any parole proceeding, and of any release or escape of the accused.
  3. The right not to be excluded from public court proceedings, subject to limited exceptions.
  4. The right to be reasonably heard at public proceedings involving release, plea, sentencing, or parole.
  5. The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the government.
  6. The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.
  7. The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
  8. The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
  9. The right to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement.
  10. The right to be informed of the rights under the section and of available services, and of how to contact the Victims' Rights Ombudsman.

Two structural provisions matter as much as the list. The statute directs courts to ensure victims are afforded these rights, to make every effort to permit the fullest attendance possible, and to consider alternatives before excluding a victim from proceedings. It also directs federal officers and employees to make their best efforts to notify victims of their rights and to advise them that they may seek the advice of an attorney.

Practical note: Exclusion from a trial is the exception most likely to arise, and it usually comes up when a victim is also a witness. The statute makes clear that a victim should not be excluded merely because they may testify unless the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the victim's testimony would be materially altered by hearing other testimony. If exclusion is proposed, ask the prosecutor to put that standard in front of the judge.

What to do when a right is denied

The federal statute contains its own enforcement route, which is unusual and worth knowing. A victim, the victim's lawful representative, or the prosecutor may assert the rights in the district court where the case is pending. The court must decide the claim promptly. If relief is denied, the victim may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus, and the statute sets a tight timetable for that court to act.

There are limits. The statute does not create a cause of action for damages, and a failure to afford a right is not a ground for a new trial. In practice, that means timing is everything: a right asserted before a plea is entered or a sentence is imposed can be meaningful, while the same objection raised afterward often cannot undo what happened.

The Justice Department also maintains an internal complaint process through the Victims' Rights Ombudsman for allegations that a federal employee failed to provide the required rights, and prosecutors' offices employ victim-witness coordinators whose job is to deliver notice and services.

State victim rights and how they differ

Because nearly all criminal prosecutions are brought under state law, most victims will be operating in a state system rather than the federal one. Every state has adopted victim rights provisions, and a majority have placed them in the state constitution — often under some version of Marsy's Law, which has been adopted in a number of states since 2008.

Where federal and state victim rights schemes commonly diverge
QuestionTypical federal answerTypical state variation
Source of the rightFederal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3771State constitution, statute, or both
Who counts as a victimA person directly and proximately harmed by a federal offense; representatives may act for minors and incapacitated or deceased victimsDefinitions vary; some states limit rights by offense type or to felonies
NotificationFederal notification systems plus the prosecuting officeState automated notification services, usually requiring registration
EnforcementMotion in the district court, then mandamus in the court of appealsMotion practice, appellate review, or an ombudsman or board — remedies differ widely
Standing to appealLimited; no damages remedy and no new trial as a remedySome states grant broader standing; others provide little practical remedy
RestitutionMandatory for many offense categoriesRanges from mandatory to discretionary depending on offense and state

Two practical differences deserve attention. First, notification in most states runs through an automated system that requires the victim to register — the rights exist, but the alerts do not start until someone signs up. Second, states differ on whether rights attach at the investigative stage or only once charges are filed, which affects notice about release decisions of the kind described in our guide to bail and pretrial release.

Being heard: impact statements and the moments that count

The right to be heard is commonly associated with sentencing, but the federal statute is broader, covering release, plea, sentencing, and parole proceedings. Each of those is a distinct opportunity, and each has different useful content:

  • Release hearings. Information about safety concerns, prior threats, or proximity is directly relevant to conditions such as no-contact orders and stay-away distances.
  • Plea proceedings. A victim may address the court about a proposed disposition. The prosecutor still decides what to offer, but the record can influence acceptance and conditions.
  • Sentencing. The victim impact statement describes physical, emotional, and financial effects. It may usually be delivered orally, in writing, or both, and representatives may speak where the victim is a minor, incapacitated, or deceased.
  • Parole and release review. Many state boards accept written statements and testimony, sometimes years after sentencing, and registration is generally required to receive notice.

What impact statements should not contain is advice about the sentence's legality or accusations beyond the offense of conviction; courts sometimes limit content, and prosecutors' victim-witness staff can advise on local practice. In domestic cases in particular, the right to be heard often intersects with protective order conditions — see our guide to domestic violence charges.

Restitution, compensation, and civil claims

These three routes are frequently confused, and they operate differently.

  • Restitution is ordered by the criminal court against the defendant for losses caused by the offense — medical costs, property damage or loss, lost income, counseling, and certain expenses of participating in the case. Documentation is essential; an undocumented loss usually cannot be ordered. Restitution obligations typically survive the sentence and can be enforced as a judgment.
  • Crime victim compensation comes from a state fund rather than the defendant, does not require a conviction, and covers a defined list of expenses subject to caps, deadlines, and cooperation requirements. Every state administers a program; application deadlines can be short.
  • A civil lawsuit is a separate case the victim files, with a lower burden of proof, broader categories of damages, and its own statute of limitations — but collection depends entirely on the defendant's assets.

Restitution and compensation coordinate: a fund that pays a victim usually takes over the claim to that amount. Where the defendant is on supervision, unpaid restitution can become a supervision issue, though inability to pay is treated differently from refusal — a distinction covered in our guide to probation and parole violations.

Frequently asked questions

Can I stop the prosecutor from dismissing the case?

No. Charging and dismissal decisions belong to the government, and victims are not parties. What you do have is the right to confer with the prosecutor, to be informed of any plea or deferred prosecution agreement, and to be heard at the plea proceeding. Those rights give you a voice in the decision, not a veto over it.

How do I find out when hearings happen?

Register. Federal cases run through the prosecuting office and federal notification systems; states operate automated victim notification services that alert registrants about hearings, custody status, and release. Notification generally does not begin until you register and provide current contact details, so update them whenever they change.

Do I have to attend the trial to give an impact statement?

No. Attendance and being heard are separate rights. You can decline to attend proceedings and still submit a written impact statement, or ask that someone deliver it on your behalf. Conversely, you generally cannot be excluded from public proceedings merely because you may testify, absent a specific judicial finding.

What if I am never told about a hearing that already happened?

Raise it immediately with the prosecutor and, if necessary, by motion in the court where the case is pending. Federal law provides for prompt decision and appellate review by mandamus, and many states have comparable procedures. Speed matters: relief is far more likely before a plea or sentence becomes final than after.

Where to go from here

Three concrete steps cover most of what a victim can do to make these rights operate. Register for notification in every system that applies — the prosecutor's office, the state's automated service, and the corrections agency if there is a custodial sentence. Ask to be assigned a victim-witness coordinator and use them; that office exists to deliver notice, explain schedules, and arrange participation.

Second, document losses as they occur, with receipts, invoices, medical records, and proof of missed work. Restitution is limited by what can be shown, and reconstructing records months later is much harder than keeping them from the start. Check the deadline for your state's compensation fund early, since it is often measured from the date of the offense or the date of reporting.

Third, remember that you may consult your own attorney. The prosecutor represents the government, not you, and in contested situations — asserting a right that has been denied, weighing a civil claim, or responding to a subpoena from the defense — independent advice is worth having. Grant-funded advocacy organizations, many supported through the Office on Violence Against Women and other Department of Justice programs, can also help with support and referrals. For background on how the case around you is structured, start with what happens after an arrest and the rest of our criminal law guides.

Sources & further reading

Accord Legal Review Editorial Team

Accord Legal Review is an independent publisher of U.S. legal guides. Our editorial organization researches primary sources — statutes, regulations, and official agency guidance — and keeps volatile figures pointed at the live official source. Read our editorial standards.